If you were asked to provide proof of all DOT training requirements for each of your hazmat employees, how would you fair? 

Hazmat compliance training is not to be taken lightly.

Compliance with the DOT’s hazmat regulations really starts by the hazmat employer taking responsibility as an offeror of the articles or substances which are deemed classified as hazardous materials.

These materials must be offered for transport with a statement included in the shipping papers that certifies that a hazardous material shipment is in full compliance. Most bills of lading have wording similar to this incorporated in the fine print somewhere near the bottom of the page.

I hereby declare that the contents of this consignment are fully and accurately described above by the proper shipping name, and are classified, packaged, marked and labeled/placarded, and are in all respects in proper condition for transport according to applicable international and national governmental regulations.

How does a shipper achieve this? Well, the hazmat employer is responsible to provide training. This ensures all the relevant employees (hazmat employees) who directly affect the safety of a shipment are knowledgeable in the all the specific job related functions that may directly apply to them i.e. identification, classification, packaging, marking, labeling/placarding and shipping papers. The DOT requires validation of this by way of testing the competency of the employee. This can be in any form verbal or written. As this is the employer`s responsibility they must also establish what is a satisfactory passing score. Certification is done by way of recording the details of the training. Each hazmat employer must create and retain a record of current training of each hazmat employee, inclusive of the preceding three years, in accordance with the regulations for as long as that employee is employed by that employer as a hazmat employee and for 90 days thereafter. A hazmat employer must make a hazmat employee’s record of current training available upon request, at a reasonable time and location, to any DOT inspector. The record must include:

1. The hazmat employee’s name;

2. The most recent training completion date of the hazmat employee’s training;

3. A description, copy, or the location of the training materials used to meet the necessary requirements of 5 major areas of training;

4. The name and address of the person providing the training; and

5. Certification that the hazmat employee has been trained and tested.


The five areas of training that must be addressed are as follows: General Awareness/Familiarization; Function-Specific; Safety; Security; Driver training.

The requirements for the first four ensure the hazmat employee can competently determine that a shipment is in compliance with the Hazardous Materials Regulations in CFR-49.are provided in Part 172, Subpart H of CFR49 and any other international requirement whether shipping or receiving.

Driver training, however, is located in 49 CFR 177.816 and applies to anyone who transports any quantity of a DOT regulated hazardous material.

If you ship internationally, training for international shipping requires compliance with each particular mode i.e. Vessel- IMO-IMDG Code and/or air-ICAO/IATA DGR. This training can be used as an alternative to satisfy the function specific requirements as they apply.

What are the hazmat employer`s options to provide adequate training?

There are a limited amount of options for the hazmat employer to address all of these requirements.

First option would be to have someone in house appointed as the DG/hazmat regulatory specialist. The upside is everything is under the same corporate structure. The downside is the cost of hiring someone new full-time which most companies can’t justify because there isn’t enough time to warrant the cost. Assigning the role to an existing employee, usually an EH&S staffer is the alternative. They usually have enough regulatory issues to deal with and have no hazmat training experience. They are usually the designated department responsible for compliance and as such rely on outside help for this.

The second option is having employees enroll in on-line courses. These are fairly inexpensive and although the cheapest way to approach compliance they provide a very limited understanding in achieving true compliance with any subject matter as there is no interaction with student and trainer.

Another traditional method is sending each hazmat employee to a public course. These can be very expensive depending on location and the amount of staff needed to be trained. A typical 3-day public class is approximately $750.00 per attendee as well as incurred travel costs if the class location is not local.

Most open enrollment public seminars provide a lot of information and frankly, three days of regulatory details usually overwhelms the average shipper. If you have a variety of products and classes or perhaps you are in the forwarding business and need a broad spectrum approach, this is ideal. Legally, the hazmat employer is only responsible for what they ship. So realistically these generic classes cannot possibly provide you with all pertinent training specific to each shipper’s needs. Yes they provide a lot of relevant information but not specifically for everybody’s situation. Why? There are way too many variables. For instance, there are 9 hazardous classes that range from explosives, flammable liquids and solids, compressed gases to radio-active materials, oxidizers, infectious substances and corrosives. Then you have the modal specific requirements for air, rail, truck and vessel as well as the packaging standards for bulk and non-bulk. I could go on. But why sit through details on topics you will never be required to use? This is not a DOT requirement! I have sat through enough of these classes where another attendee has too much to say about their particular issues and after three days, can be very disruptive.

A more effective approach is site specific training classes. The instructor addresses the necessary regulatory information and specific details that only apply directly to the shipper`s needs at the shipper’s location. All dangerous goods/hazmat staff is trained privately as a team for their particular job functions. Another added convenience to this format is the shipper can decide on the location and date based on their preference. Rates vary for each class format but a good rule of thumb is approximately $1500-2000 per day.

Depending on the assortment of products, packaging formats and modes of transport, most client`s needs can be addressed thoroughly in 1 or 2 days. One of the big benefits I have seen with site-specific classes is that real communication is achieved by the trainer by physically touring the facility and getting valuable insight of the operation which he then can relate to in class. Compared to public classes, on-site classes are an informal open forum that provides constructive discussion between all the participants concerning their site specific compliance issues. They are also conducive to inter-department discussion and promote possible alternative solutions to existing hazmat shipping problems. Attendees can ask specific questions without disrupting the class as they are all involved in the same process. One of our popular tools is preparing a typical mock consignment in class using actual packagings, labels and forms. This is not as effective in public classes because the variety of participants.

Consistency is also achieved as all the staff is trained at one time from the same instructor.

Making sure clients` needs are effectively achieved, a good trainer will request a “Client’s Needs Assessment” be completed. This provides them with all the relevant details needed to obtain 100% compliance for their clients.

Hazmat compliance should not be taken lightly. Enforcement is strict business and fines can be costly.

There is no minimum civil penalty, except for a minimum penalty of $450 for violations relating to training. When the violation is a continuing one, each day of the violation can constitute a separate offense. My suggestion to anyone charged with a proposed fine of non-compliance is to quickly respond and comply as soon as possible. This willingness to comply will be taken into consideration before the final fine is presented.  On the bright side, training costs can be a healthy investment for providing an increase in safety awareness for reducing possible accidents and peace of mind for the employer knowing they have completely fulfilled their legal regulatory requirement.

Comments are closed.